Promulgations » Jurist » Supreme Court rules against retroactive application of pregnancy discrimination law

Feeds

45327 items (45327 unread) in 19 feeds

US (8652 unread)

• LawyersUSA
• LawLibrary (1694 unread)
• This Day at Law (1625 unread)
• Jurist (5301 unread)
• Cyber-Law (32 unread)

DE (25956 unread)

• 123recht (12873 unread)
• JuraBlogs (13083 unread)

IT (472 unread)

• Professionisti (115 unread)
• Legali (357 unread)

FR (3169 unread)

• Village de la Justice (2956 unread)
• Jurisexpert (213 unread)

CZ (779 unread)

• Liberalni institut (180 unread)
• Legalizace (599 unread)

BG (750 unread)

• Bulgaria Law News (750 unread)

NL (1823 unread)

• RvdJ (120 unread)
• Rechtspraak (1703 unread)

ID (356 unread)

• Hukum Indonesia (356 unread)

TR (3370 unread)

• Turkish Law (55 unread)
• HukukiNetLaw (3315 unread)

Jurist

• 

  Supreme Court rules against retroactive application of pregnancy discrimination law

  Posted: May 18th, 2009, 7:49am MSD by Andrew Morgan

  Tags:    [edit]

  [JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] Monday ruled [opinion, PDF] 7-2 in ATT Corp. v. Hulteen [Cornell LII backgrounder; JURIST report] that companies do not violate the Pregnancy Discrimination Act (PDA) [EEOC backgrounder] by failing to award employees credit for maternity leave taken before the act's effective date. The Court found that although the method of